Sunday, July 5, 2009

Should a person Wear a Marriage Ring or not?

( Note that mens marriage rings and mens marriage bands are interchangeable, both meaning a similar thing. Mens rings.

It became the custom for US squaddies going to war to publicise their marital standing by the wearing of a person's marriage ring. They were pleased to make public their dedication to their better half by the wearing of a public symbol that announced that commitment to all. Today it is maybe as common for a newly married man to wear a ring as not. And his other half may well regard it as a condition of the marriage that he do so. Of course, in these days of equality, if she is prepared to make a statement then should he not do so as well? Notwithstanding the proven fact that the wearing of a ring by a lady is a matter of choice, it is in truth nearly mandatory because of the fact that it's so common.

We know the Celts, like Local folk of Northern America, viewed the earth itself as well as all sides of life and death as divine. The natural world was considered holy, and each stream, mountain and tree had its own spirit of place. Early Celtic leaders even ridiculed human-like pictures of Olympian gods or the wild animals of their vale and forests. Often a person's marriage band is worn on the ring finger, the same as for ladies. The ring finger, for those single men not acquainted with the theorem, is the 4th finger of the left hand. It is completely possible for a pair to get a ring set where the style of the rings match completely, or maybe with matching engraved messages of love. Often though , even where the couple are to wear a matching ring set, the 2 rings are dissimilar. The reason being because men's hands and girls's hands are dissimilar.

No comments:

Post a Comment